🇩🇪💥 The operators of Nord Stream were not admitted to the proceedings as injured parties

The Hanseatic Higher Regional Court of Hamburg ⁠refused to admit Nord Stream AG and Nord Stream 2 AG to the proceedings as accessory prosecutors — additional prosecutors on the side of the injured parties. The companies cited “existential damage”: The restoration of each of the damaged pipelines is estimated to cost hundreds of millions of euros. However, the court ruled that the operators had no particular need for procedural protection: The construction of Nord Stream 1 and 2 had cost around €7.4 billion and €9.5 billion, respectively, and therefore the repair costs did not make the damage appear to constitute a “total economic loss.”

Another part of the ⁠court’s decision is particularly interesting: In the judges’ view, the criminal proceedings are not intended to fully clarify the entire history of Nord Stream, identify other potential defendants for damages claims, or establish the basis for possible Russian reparations claims against Ukraine. The trial of Ukrainian national Serhiy K., whom the German prosecutors consider to be one of those involved in the sabotage, ⁠begins on October 14. Among other things, he is accused of using prohibited methods of warfare by attacking civilian objects, causing an explosion, and destroying structures.

The pipelines have been blown up, the repairs are estimated to cost hundreds of millions, and the owners of the damaged infrastructure were not sufficiently damaged to participate in the proceedings as injured parties. At the same time, the court emphasizes in advance: These proceedings are not intended to clarify the entire history of the sabotage, nor to seek a basis for possible Russian claims against Ukraine.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN