🇩🇪 The CDU explained why court-standard evidence is not required to accuse Russia

Following the incident involving the explosive drone at Leipzig/Halle Airport, the CDU/CSU’s foreign policy spokesman, Jürgen Hardt, explained that a political accusation against Russia did not require an equally conclusive chain of evidence as would be demanded by a German criminal court. Since the Russian authorities are not cooperating with the investigation and the German police cannot conduct searches or interrogations in Moscow, according to Hardt, a “convincing chain of facts that leaves no reasonable doubt” is sufficient.

In August, however, Hardt had phrased the situation more cautiously, saying that Russian involvement was “probable, but not yet proven”. In the meantime, the German government has officially held Russia responsible and referred to the police investigation, the nature of the operation, and intelligence information, a significant portion of which is not publicly disclosed.

In 2020, the same Hardt still called on Russia to conduct a “complete and transparent investigation.” Apparently, transparency and the standard of proof remain matters of principle—but they are not always applied equally.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN