TGViewer
Sharing Sharing @nicegram · 5.52K subscribers
Post #1245 711
Personally, I don’t think Getgems should bear direct responsibility for this incident. The bidding feature on the platform is essentially open to everyone, meaning anyone can make an offer, and users are always free to ignore or reject those requests.

In many scam cases, the core issue is not that the platform forces users into transactions, but that some users authorize requests without carefully reviewing the transaction details, which ultimately leads to losses. From my perspective, many of these risks could be avoided if users took the time to properly verify what they are approving before confirming any transaction.

Of course, platforms should continue improving security warnings and user education, but overall, I think Getgems handled the PR response to this situation fairly well. That’s why I still support Getgems.
  • ❤ 11
  • 👍 10
  • 🔥 7
More from @nicegram
  1. Oct 10, 2026What do you plan to give @monk as a birthday gift? Even just a birthday wish will do; I’ll…
  2. Oct 10, 2026Durov wished his manhood was as big as the prop penis on the cake. Too bad saying it out l…
  3. Oct 10, 2026Happy birthday durov 🎂 @monk
  4. Oct 8, 2026Here
  5. Oct 8, 20261.35$
  6. Oct 8, 2026Post #1726
Threads Profile ViewerView any public Threads profile without an account.Open ThreadLook →Writing with AI? Make it sound human.Metric37 rewrites AI drafts so they read naturally. Free AI detector, 1,500 words free.Try Metric37 →