– “We Remain True to the Pledge” by remaining committed to our constants, foremost among them the courageous, dignified, divine resistance with a mission, in confronting aggression.

– We support the continuation of the resistance, and we will work to maintain it against the enemy so that it leaves our land and we achieve the complete liberation of the occupied territory.

– “We Remain True to the Pledge” means that we preserve the trust of the martyrs, foremost among them the Master of the Ummah's Martyrs, Sayyed Hassan.

– “We Remain True to the Pledge” means that we work on the basis of supporting Palestine and liberating Palestine, and we also support the complete liberation of the land.

– “We Remain True to the Pledge” means that we learn from the previous phases and draw lessons and insights from them.

– Some, particularly among our opponents, ask: What did the resistance do? But it seems they have forgotten a question: What did the state do?

– The resistance halted the aggression project; this is what it did. It prevented it from achieving its objectives.

– The resistance proved that the forces whose numbers reach 90,000 “Israeli” soldiers and officers were unable to achieve their objectives by breaking the resistance.

– The resistance prevented the enemy from consolidating the “Israeli” occupation and establishing settlements in Lebanon.

– The resistance confronted “Israel,” which is backed by America with extraordinary and unlimited capabilities.

– With these great sacrifices that have been made so far, we can only continue; we cannot be defeated, and we will continue. Never shall we accept humiliation.

– The resistance fighters halted the advance of the enemy army’s brigades and tens of thousands of its troops, despite all the bombardment and destruction using various types of weapons.

– We confronted them in numerous areas and stood firm as resistance fighters and as a resistance, to the extent permitted by the battlefield and the resistance’s method of operation.

– We stood firm in Bint Jbeil, Khiam, Aita Al-Shaab, Naqoura, Al-Bayada, and Ali Al-Taher, and everywhere there was resistance in the south.

– In Ali Al-Taher, the steadfastness lasted for three months, while in every location, the steadfastness lasted for months.

– The resistance confronts the enemy through two things: first, confronting it at the place and time to the extent possible; and second, preventing the enemy from establishing itself.

– The secrets concerning how the battle is managed and its nature cannot be disclosed.

– Everyone was surprised by the preparations during the Battle of the Devoured Straw, which means that keeping certain details undisclosed is related to the way the battle is managed.

– The problem lies with the aggression, not with the resistance, as some say.

– The resistance was established only because of aggression; therefore, aggression is the cause, and aggression is the problem.

– Surrendering to the “Israeli” enemy means the end of Lebanon and coexistence in favor of “Israeli” settlements.

– If some people accept surrender, we do not. This country is ours together, and we must reach an understanding. We will not relinquish a single inch of the 10,452-square-kilometer territory.

– The foundation, support, and future of the country is southern Lebanon.

– To the “sovereigntists”: Do not tell us, “Look at what the aggression did because you are resisting it.” Rather, ask yourselves: Why do you not resist it? Why do you make concessions?

– The Memorandum of Understanding is what reduced the level of escalation to the level we are seeing today.

– You spent two years trying to disarm us and were unable to do so, so why are you asking the Lebanese Army? What does the issue of weapons have to do with you?

– The Lebanese Army is a national army. The people in Lebanon reach understandings among themselves; you are not the ones who impose what you want. Asking the Lebanese Army to be a tool for you—“that is too much for you to bear.”