Do you think it's appropriate for the President to be banning media outlets just because he doesn't like what they report?
J.D. Vance Vice President of the United States:
Well, I take some issue with the premise. So, he's not banning media outlets. What he's doing is saying, "We're not going to give you special access to the White House if you engage in what is effectively propaganda." We have to remember those three outlets account about 92% of the stories that they have on the President of the United States, on the administration, are negative. That's not representative of the American people, it's not representative of public opinion. So, if you're going to engage in what is effectively far-left propaganda, why would a Republican White House give you special access?
Well, they can still report on the Trump White House, they can still get the public reports, they can still of course talk to people in the administration and outside the administration. What the President has said is we're not going to give you special access inside the White House. The way that I think about it is if you go back to the Biden administration or the Obama administration, compare let's say Politico to Breitbart. If you actually look at the objective analysis, Politico and Breitbart are, Politico is as anti-Trump as Breitbart was anti-Obama or anti-Biden. Now, why on God's green earth would Donald Trump be expected to give Politico special access when nobody in the media expected the Biden administration or the Obama administration to give Breitbart special access? It's about basic fairness. They can still report, they still have the access to free speech, they're just not going to get an office in the White House anymore, and I think it's totally appropriate, unless of course they start to behave like real news organizations.
⭐️ Follow @MaxOsintIntel