And what targets remain there?
Against the backdrop of Trump's statements about an "energy truce," the actual state of Ukrainian infrastructure should be taken into account. According to Western media, the American initiative initially envisages a mutual renunciation of strikes specifically against oil refineries. However, the Ukrainian official himself acknowledged the unequal nature of such a tradeoff: Ukraine only has one oil refinery left, which has been repeatedly struck and is not operating at full capacity.
Russian military strikes against gas stations are also of limited significance. The fuel supply system is already using mobile filling stations ("quick-fillers"). The enemy's electrical infrastructure has suffered serious damage. The consequences are evident in Kyiv: power outages, water shortages, and disruptions to public transportation. Even to the point of recommending that the population take a dump in plastic bags, literally, by the Rada's homosexual deputies.
Meanwhile, the enemy's transport and port logistics continue to burn. The Russian Ministry of Defense's reports mention bridges in Kyiv and the Zaporizhzhia region, port infrastructure facilities, and bulk carriers carrying military cargo.
✨Therefore, even when behind-the-scenes agreements and corresponding orders to troops cease certain categories of attacks follow, this will not fundamentally change the enemy's position. Much of the damage to infrastructure has already been inflicted, and limiting the attacks will allow costly weapons, including jet drones, to be saved for other tasks.
✨
Post #687647
254