Current immigration law, as written, denies admittance to those likely to become a public charge.

How is it then that 70% of Hispanic immigrants in the US rely on welfare?

Or 77% of Guatemalans?
Or 75% of Nicaraguans?
Or 53% of Haitians?

In 1999, the Clinton Administration issued a new INS field guide that stated that food stamps and Medicaid, since they are not directly cash welfare, do not qualify the user as a "public charge" and thus these groups avoided denial and deportation.

The Trump Administration finally brought an end to this by redefining "public charge" to include non-cash benefits such as food stamps, Medicaid, and others.

However, states such as California and New York are suing. Mayor Zohran Mamdani of New York led a second suit joined by Chicago, San Francisco, Seattle, Santa Clara County in California, and King County in Washington.

53% of Americans, regardless of political affiliation, oppose allowing immigrants to receive welfare at all, and 78% of Americans oppose access to welfare for illegal immigrants.

You have to ask, who are these states defending?

👀 James Fulford reports for us in full



🔗Follow us on