I agree but attack how and who
Attacking the U.S preemptively is enough to rally the U.S population and the gov for a war 10 folds worse on Iran and even give the pretext to not only invading but de-militarizing Iran.
Attack Israel? Sounds good on paper but in effect would be consumed by U.S and Arab air defenses
The whole situation is not good because there is no clear solution. Not for us and not for them.
It's a messed up situation when they Launch a war and fail. Then launch another bigger and fail and then now taunt a third
With each they can regroup, rest and even soften the targets when we sit idle both under attack and besieged. It's much worse here in south Lebanon than Iran
I'm hopeful that this would end well for us but God I'm engulfed in extreme hate, frustration and anger.
Post #62841
29.6K
Middle East Spectator — MES There is one thing I cannot stress enough. And I will say this only once. Iran’s primary military advantage lies in a pre-emptive attack. Ballistic missiles are best used suddenly and in large waves, to overwhelm defenses. Waiting to get attacked again for the umpteenth time when the enemy is OPENLY telling you they will, is not ‘strategic patience’ but ‘strategic stupidity’.
- 👍 110
- 👎 38
- 💔 33
- 👀 6
- 🤬 4