💉🦠 WHO AND THE PANDEMIC AGREEMENT.

Part 1.

May 2025. The world is on the verge of signing the so-called “Pandemic Agreement” - an international treaty that, for the first time in history, enshrines the obligations of countries to act according to a pre-agreed scenario in the context of a declared “pandemic”.

Whereas previously the World Health Organization (WHO) could only make recommendations, it will now coordinate and approve specific measures: closing borders, introducing lockdowns, mass testing, and vaccination.

Each state that signs the agreement undertakes to implement the approved steps. And refusal can be interpreted as a violation of international obligations - with consequences, including sanctions.

⚠️ Thus, a legal structure is created where the WHO decisions become mandatory. This is a new level of global governance, similar in structure to other supranational entities such as the WTO or the UN, only in the area of ​​“biological safety”. These are not just recommendations, this is an international agreement that carries with it a mechanism of legal pressure and subordination.

⚡️ The media and activists are sounding the alarm. People are protesting, creating petitions, recording videos: "The WHO will gain global power! We are facing a sanitary dictatorship! We will be closed again!"

🙂 The WHO is perceived as the main villain, and is considered by many to be responsible for the COVID catastrophe and the violation of basic human rights of people around the world.

🤔 Yes, there is nothing good about the WHO and this new agreement. It is clearly being prepared in anticipation of the next "pandemic". But let's stop and remember: what really happened during COVID?

❗️ The truth is that During Covid-19, WHO did not order anything to anyone. It had no formal authority to compel countries to take any action. The WHO could only recommend. And no country in the world was obliged to follow its instructions. There was no international agreement that obliged countries to coordinate their actions and take the so-called “pandemic” seriously. Even the International Health Regulations (IHR) did not contain any requirements for lockdowns, masks, vaccinations, or vaccination passes. The IHR required reporting of “outbreaks,” development of surveillance systems, and cooperation with the WHO in this regard – but did not prescribe specific response measures.

However, almost all countries, as if on cue, began to act in unison:

▪️Closed the borders
▪️Locked people in their homes like prisoners
▪️Imposed curfews as if a war had started
▪️Divided society by declaring the unvaccinated a “threat”
▪️Pushed vaccines through blackmail and pressure
▪️Destroyed small businesses, while allowing corporations to thrive
▪️Implemented total surveillance under the guise of “health protection”

❗️ Moreover, the synchronicity was so comprehensive that even countries that formally have no relation to the WHO, such as North Korea, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Venezuela, Eritrea and even Afghanistan under the control of the Taliban, also joined in and acted as one with the rest of the world.

😠 Even the US, a country that officially left the WHO in 2020, did not cancel lockdowns, vaccinations or restrictions. The WHO had no legal authority to order them to do anything. It was their choice. A conscious and deliberate decision. Just like those countries that used the WHO simply as a cover, pretending that they had to obey. It was a convenient smokescreen to hide behind, to avoid responsibility.

📝 But in reality, each country had already prepared its own laws, decrees, and regulations. In many countries, long before 2020, legislation was adopted which allowed for the introduction of an "state of emergency" in the event of a "health threat." This technical ability to do all of this had already been prepared. And it was activated as soon as an "official reason" appeared, and this would have been done even if the WHO had not existed at all during COVID.

😭❔ Why was all this necessary? The answer is simple: it was profitable. And here's why.

Continued below⬇️