#их_нравы #фейспалм

Реальная сегодняшняя рецензия на рукопись:

After a careful evaluation of your manuscript, it has been noted that this article lacks scientific novelty to be considered for publication in this journal. The following points should be addressed before submitting the work elsewhere:

1. The abstract fails to clearly convey the essence of the paper and is poorly written.
2. The introduction does not adequately compare the present work with recent literature.
3. Too many irrelevant references have been included; citations should be carefully selected to match the scope of the current study.
4. The theoretical discussion does not accurately present the required information.
5. The manuscript does not explain the practical significance of the work.
6. The paper requires substantial rewriting and should be submitted elsewhere after thorough revision.

Черновик ответа Смотрителя:

Dear Reviewer, after carefully reading your message, we have thoroughly revised the manuscript, making the following corrections:

If you didn't even read the manuscript, at least spare yourself the embarrassment of a copy-pasted template. Go fuck yourself.

Предлагайте дополнительные варианты в комменты, коллеги