To nail Task Response, it's important to write about realistic things and not to go to extremes. People often go to two extremes - overdramatization and overbenefitization. Let me exemplify.
Topic: "Because some children do not seem to have a natural ability to learn another language, schools should not force those children to study a foreign language. Do you agree or disagree?"
📝 Overdramatization
If a child is made exempt from taking a foreign language class due to lack of aptitude, they will
📝 Overbenefitization
If a child takes a foreign language class, they will be
Sure, it's not like the scenarios above are entirely impossible, but they are not very likely. There is a huge gap, with many variables, between a language class at school and depression or being a thriving adult.
It's best to stick to more realistic outcomes, both positive and negative. What would be more realistic for a school child?
Maybe, if a "talentless" child is exempt from a foreign language class, they will have more time to take advanced classes of the subject they do have a talent in or to prepare for exams or to volunteer. Btw, why would these be better than taking a language class? Share in the comments. 📝
#ieltswritingtask2