https://substack.com/@revealedeye/note/c-350351070
I admire this doctor for her honesty, including her description of her previous position and what forced her to change. As a non-medic, I traced a similar arc, after thirty years in pharmaceutical R&D.
Ask yourself what possible motive would she have to lie about the “covid” pokes, as she calls them? There is none.
The logical conclusion is that she believes that what she says is true.
You need only decide if she’s competent to have made the judgment that she has.
I’m pleased that she used the word “impossible” about the timeline of claimed development of these injections. That’s so obviously correct, and visible to everyone who knows even the barest outline of what was supposedly done.
Realising you’re being lied to is one thing. I believe a lot more doctors know that’s true. Saying it out loud and taking action based on it is another thing entirely. That’s relatively uncommon, a fact that ought to make us very uncomfortable about, in this case, medical doctors as a group.
I wonder if she’s already reasoned that a system capable of lying not only to the trusting public but to the knowing practitioners about vaccines is unlikely to be telling the truth about other things?
Please share this brave doctor’s conclusions.
Best wishes
Mike
Post #1093
595
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
- 👍 19
- ❤ 3