Isolat Truth Fund - €1.5 million

What happened?

On October 17, 2022, Prof. Ulrike Kämmerer accepted the challenge to provide scientific proof of the existence of a "disease-causing virus."

Result: Neither Prof. Kämmerer nor her supporter, the molecular biologist "Franky," was able to provide scientific proof of existence.

—-

🔘 Let us recap:

💢 A virologist and a molecular biologist practically shouted their claim to the world, stating they would provide THE proof of an allegedly "pathogenic virus." Yet, to this day, the world has seen nothing of the sort. 👉 To date, no evidence has been published or submitted to Samuel Eckert❗️

💢 Several lawyers have claimed they could present this evidence or that they were in possession of such proof.
👉 Yet, to this day, none of these lawyers have actually presented anything ❗️
What does this tell us about the parties involved and the alleged evidence ❓

🔘 Our conclusion:

‼️ By claiming that they have now provided evidence, or that they are yet to provide it, they have indirectly confirmed that this has never happened before, and that to this day there is no evidence of a "disease-causing virus"‼️

===

Concluding remark:
When influential individuals and groups define themselves as critics of the coronavirus narrative—yet not only suppress substantive criticism but also perpetuate the narrative with claims like "we have the proof" while refusing to produce that "proof" for scientific scrutiny upon request—then even the staunchest "virus proponents" ought to sit up and take notice after more than three years of pseudoscience, acknowledge the facts, and call them by their true names.

What do you think?
Wouldn't a scientist who had produced genuine proof of something—something claimed worldwide but never before proven—unfailingly and immediately publish that "proof" (a sensation!) to show the entire world, "Here it is: THE proof," and thereby once and for all strip all critics of any grounds for doubt? ❓

Source : Next Level