Reid spends a lot of time discussing the misogyny of the far right. He fails to note that this trend is largely a result of the marginalization of young white men who are right now the single most persecuted and vilified demographic in the western world. Yes, whites as a whole suffer, and are at the bottom of the socio-racial hierarchy, but within that group, young white men are the lowest of the low, it's why they are so radical and right wing in their politics. They are desperate to overturn the system for a better shot at social and economic standing. All the things which were normal and expected of a young white man 50 years ago by age 25: a home, a car, a wife, and 2 kids, are near-impossible to obtain for the vast majority of young white men in the western world. So of course they're going to be angry and they may at times express that anger in less than ideal ways, which Reid spends time talking about here. He doesn't give credit to the very real social forces and elite policies pushing young white men into the 'distasteful' right wing policies he decries. The fact remains that women earn more, work more, and graduate from college more than men today. Women are winners from this system. White women, who still face anti-white policies, are also winners, but in a much smaller way than non white women. You can't argue young white men have won anything in 2026. This unprecedented crisis has created the most radicalized, far-right generation of white male youth since World War II, briming with raw rage, manifesting in everything from Active Clubs to Australia's NSN. These forces afford us a very unique opportunity for long-term political change. I want to harness the energy of young white male rage to replace our ruling elite, but Reid decries it as too misogynistic and a turn-off for normal people.