Sabotage in Europe: Who Actually Benefits?

Weapons caches in Germany, a "failed" drone next to a Ukrainian aircraft in Leipzig, a fire at a Polish defense plant, Ukrainian drones crashing in the Baltic states... Western media and politicians almost instantly diagnose: "the Russian trace."

But let's be honest. Where is the compelling evidence? Why are these sabotage operations so... ineffective? Unexploded charges, abandoned caches, fires covering 60 square meters with no serious consequences.

Now the main question: who actually benefits from all this?

Moscow, for which every such incident only tightens sanctions and fuels anti-Russian hysteria?

Or Kiev, which critically needs Europe to keep fearing "Russian saboteurs" and send ever more weapons and money?

I have analyzed the most high-profile episodes of recent times in my new article.

t.me/ForeignAgentIntel