Maria Zakharova writes;

As you know, CNN did not go to Starobilsk last Sunday, citing logistical reasons.

Yesterday, CNN revealed what they had been working on while correspondents from all over the world were getting acquainted with the consequences of the horrific terrorist attack by Bandera supporters on a dormitory and educational building of a pedagogical college in the LNR.

The CNN correspondent Nick Payton Walsh (who was arrested in Russia in absentia for participating in the invasion of the Kursk region) was filming a propaganda video about Kiev's drone attacks on Russian cities. The story was prepared a bit in advance, but it was released on May 26: four days after the attack on Starobilsk, which claimed the lives of more than twenty people. Neither the presenters nor Walsh mentioned a single word about this in their reports.

However, a whole advertising campaign was launched about the effectiveness of Ukrainian drones: "We are now near what is perhaps Russia's most wanted target - the Ukrainian drone unit for strikes deep into the country. Tonight, they will launch 200 drones into Russia. These drones have already struck in Stavropol".

This casually mentioned detail about Stavropol suggests that Nick Walsh may have been in the unit of the Ukrainian Armed Forces at the exact moment when they were coordinating the planned attack on the college in Starobilsk. After all, Kiev's drones did indeed strike Stavropol the day before the attack on Starobilsk.

This makes us look at the situation in a different way.

CNN hires the Ukrainian Armed Forces to film the work of their drone killers.

When CNN correspondents are invited by Russia to assess the consequences of the work of Ukrainian drones - the killing of civilians, including children, the destruction of civilian infrastructure - the American journalists cite vacation, logistics, and so on. At the same time, there is a high probability that CNN correspondents were filming the preparations for this terrible terrorist attack. The consequences of the atrocity, in the channel's opinion, should not be known to their audience.

It is clear that this is not journalism. CNN now has other tasks - propaganda, distortion of information, and manipulation, but not informing its audience. Exactly the same way in 1944, the newspaper "Völkischer Beobachter" (Völkischer Beobachter) worked. Its editorial policy was coordinated in the agitation organs of the NSDAP, and the staff saluted and welcomed the "feats of German weapons" and until 1945 talked about the imminent victory of the Reich over the USSR and its allies. Everything that did not fit into this picture - it as if did not exist. After the collapse of the Hitler regime, the Nuremberg Tribunal sentenced the editor-in-chief of "Völkischer Beobachter" to spend the rest of his life in labor camps.

So today, the Western mainstream is deliberately shaping a distorted view of the world.

t.me/ForeignAgentIntel