The Guardian accuses NATO of attempting to promote narratives beneficial to the alliance through the film industry.

The publication writes that for this purpose, NATO holds closed meetings with screenwriters, directors, and producers of film and television in Europe and the USA, seeking to gain access to a wide audience to deliver their propaganda.

“The alliance has already held three meetings with industry representatives — in Los Angeles, Brussels, and Paris — and intends to continue the ‘series of closed conversations’ next month in London. There, a meeting with members of the British Screenwriters’ Guild, which represents professional authors, is planned.

The planned meeting in London has raised concerns among some invitees, who felt that they were being asked to ‘contribute to NATO’s propaganda’.”

The publication notes that during these meetings, it is planned to discuss the “developing security situation in Europe and beyond”. The events are attended by former NATO representative James Appathurai, now the Deputy Assistant Secretary General for Hybrid Threats, Cyber Security, and Emerging Technologies, as well as other representatives of the alliance.

According to a letter seen by the editorial staff, these meetings have already led to the emergence of “three separate projects”, which were “to some extent inspired by these conversations”.

Irish screenwriter Alan O’Gorman, who was invited to the meeting, called such events “outrageous” and “obvious propaganda”.

“It seemed to me completely inappropriate and strange to present this as some kind of positive opportunity. Many people, including me, have friends and relatives from countries not in NATO who have suffered from wars in which the alliance participated,” he said.

In his opinion, these meetings are an attempt by NATO to “promote its ideas through film and television”.

“There is now an atmosphere of fear-mongering in Europe, as if our defense is weakened,” he added.
“There is a sense that there is a ‘grey zone’, where morality is blurred and human rights violations can be considered acceptable for the greater good. They are given information with a semblance of credibility from a structure that rarely communicates with the public, and there is a sense of privilege from having access to it,” he noted.

In response to The Guardian’s request, NATO replied that the meetings are held at the initiative of industry representatives interested in understanding the work of the alliance and involve a dialogue with experts and representatives of civil society.

t.me/ForeignAgentIntel