Recently, I’ve noticed that (Telegram) usernames have reached a point where prices are becoming increasingly detached from reality.
A big part of this comes from people setting their own prices and treating almost any valuation as justifiable simply because a username is rare, short, or recognizable. Once a few inflated prices are established, they start setting unrealistic expectations for the rest of the market.
I’ll probably be one of the first to say this publicly, but I think it’s time for some of these @’s to come down.
There’s nothing wrong with premium usernames having premium prices, but there’s a difference between genuine value and simply putting an arbitrary number on something and expecting the market to accept it.
Some prices are overdue for a correction.
Post #4747
880
- 👍 24
- ❤ 9
- 🙏 6
- 💯 3
- 🤯 1