Vaticanus & Sinaiticus omit Mark 16:9-20 and here are the major errors and doctrinal problems that are caused by this massive deletion and by the doubting notes of modern versions on Mark 16:9-20.

Vaticanus and Sinaiticus:
💥Take out verse 9 & thus deny Jesus rose from the dead and appeared to Mary Magdalene
💥Take out verses 10-11 & thus deny Mary Magdalene saw Jesus and told the disciples, who believed not
💥Remove verses 12-13 and deny that Jesus appeared to two of them [the two in Mark 16:12-13 = one of the 11 Apostles of Mark 16:14/Acts 1:26 named Simon in Luke 24:34 who is also called Peter/Simon and Simon Peter in Acts 10:5, 18, Mark 3:16, Luke 22:31-34, John 1:40-42, John 21:15, and Simon/Peter called as Cephas <by Jesus in John 1:40-42>, who saw Jesus before the twelve in 1 Corinthians 15:5; + one of the rest in Luke 24:9 was Cleopas as per Luke 24:18, 24:13-35) on the road to Emmaus
💥Removes verse 14 and takes out Jesus appearing to and sitting with his disciples who were at meat
💥Removes verse 15 in which Jesus tells the apostles to go ye into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature
💥Remove verse 16 in which Jesus shows that if somebody does not believe on him, he or she is not saved since he that believeth not shall be damned.
💥Remove verses 17-18 in which Jesus tells the apostles that, for signs (since the New testament was not fully written yet), them that believe shall cast out devils, shall speak new tongues (meaning languages as per Acts 2:7-8, not the Pentecostal, wicked babbling nonsense that they are not qualified and is not for them but was for the apostles & a few in the 1st century church as signs when preaching) that if they drink any deadly thing they shall not be hurt, that they shall and that
💥Remove verse 19 and thus denies the Lord Jesus spoke to the disciples, was received up [ascended] into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God
💥Removes verse 20 and denies that the 11 apostles went forth and preached everywhere and that the Lord was working with them by confirming the word that they preached with signs.


To any modern versionist/modern version readers and undecided readers reading this, why would you want to read a modern version that doubts 3 mentions of the fact that Jesus rose (Mark 16:9, Mark 16:12-13 [when looked at alongside/ with Luke 24:33-34], and Mark 16:14) and leaves Jesus standing on mount Olivet in the gospel of Mark (that is what modern versions do by doubting Mark 16:18-19, vs Acts 1:2, 9 & Luke 24:51) without ascending into Heaven to fulfill John 16:16 and Proverbs 30:4's prophecies of Jesus' acension into Heaven? To modern version reader, why will you trust the corrupt Sinaiticus and the corrupt Vaticanus when they remove a mention of Jesus' acension into Heaven Mark 16:19 and remove 3 times of Jesus risen from the dead and being seen?

The modern versions' doubt on Mark 16:9, 12, & 14, three verses that show Jesus rose from the dead and was seen by multiple witnesses, is because of Vaticanus and Sinaiticus' omissions/deletions of those 3 verses. Thankfully the KJB keeps, preserves, and never doubts Mark 16:9-20 and its words.

Modern versions, Sinaiticus, nd Vaticanus, literally violate and go against God's command (see Deuternomy 4:2) to not DIMINISH from his word by reducing the mentions of phsyical, bodily fullfillment of the prophecy of Jesus' physical, bodily acension from being mentioned three times (Mark 16:19, Luke 24:51, Acts 1:2) to being mentioned two times and by placing unbiblical doubting footnotes on and omitting Mark 16:9-20.

Follow @AntiModernVersions
Anti Modern Versions