TGViewer
crab notes 🦀 lobsterdao crab notes 🦀 lobsterdao @crab_notes · 8.04K subscribers
Post #808 1.94K
At the moment of collapse there simply was not enough buy orders in the books for liquidation engine to sustain offloading.

Here is another, more in-depth rumour thread on how BitMex could have influenced the BTC rektage 👉 https://twitter.com/lowstrife/status/1238818943147507713

The original post was by Alameda (FTX): https://twitter.com/SBF_Alameda/status/1238306306043162625

In a nutsheel, the argument is: risk was calculated poorly and allowed to hudreds of millions to be liquidated at once while the book had 0 depth. So when you said before no one could have sold that much BTC, why - this is actually true. It was degen leveraged positions causing harm to everybody because profits & insurance fund are also in BTC.
X (formerly Twitter) lowstrife on X With the insurance fund having lost 0btc from this crash, I feel like I need to post my thoughts about the events of March 13th. The following thread is my opinion on what happened on Bitmex during the crash, an opinion that has been refuted by Bitmex h…
More from @crab_notes
  1. Aug 6, 2026Sooooo, the issuance reduction debate… 💠 My journey with this topic started with a “this…
  2. May 28, 2026A few weeks ago, in Cannes, we hosted two full days of DeFi roundtable sessions with 7️⃣0️…
  3. Sep 25, 2025New longread 🧰 "HUMBLE ft Gearbox Protocol" Today's piece is about the shift in DeFi valu…
  4. May 15, 2025In 2019, almost every VC said "F*ck tokens, we want equity. Tokens were a mistake!" A year…
  5. Aug 29, 2024Ethereum Twitter fights of the past week(s) got me to write on a broader topic... Did anyo…
  6. Apr 30, 2024Modular Lending / Modular Leverage Some thoughts about the lending space and modularity: 1…
Threads Profile ViewerView any public Threads profile without an account.Open ThreadLook →Writing with AI? Make it sound human.Metric37 rewrites AI drafts so they read naturally. Free AI detector, 1,500 words free.Try Metric37 →