๐๐ผ๐ ๐ง๐ผ ๐๐ป๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ป๐๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฃ๐๐น๐น ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐พ๐๐ฒ๐๐๐?
With Pull Requests, we lost the ability to have a proper Continuous Integration (CI) process in a way that delayed integration due to code reviews. So here comes a โShip/Show/Askโ branching strategy. The thing is that not all pull requests need code reviews.
So, whenever we make a change, we have three options:
๐น ๐ฆ๐ต๐ถ๐ฝ - Small changes that donโt need peopleโs review can be pushed directly to the main branch. We have some build pipelines running on the main brunch, which run tests and other checks, so it is a safety net for our changes. Some examples are: fixing a typo, increasing the minor dependency version, updated documentation.
๐น ๐ฆ๐ต๐ผ๐ - Here, we want to show what has been done. When you have a branch, you open a Pull Request and merge it without a review. Yet, you still want people to be notified of the change (to review it later), but donโt expect essential discussions. Some examples are: a local refactoring, fixing a bug, added a test case.
๐น ๐๐๐ธ - Here, we make our changes and open a Pull Request while waiting for feedback. We do this because we want a proper review in case we need clarification on our approach. This is a classical way of making Pull Requests. Some examples are: Adding a new feature, major refactoring, and proof of concept.
Post #1257
53.2K

- ๐ 63
- โค 2
- ๐ 1