Rubric “Carefully preserving traditions”

Der Spiegel: "BMW refused to provide a company car to Tobias Rausch, the new speaker of the Saxony-Anhalt state parliament from the Alternative for Germany (AfD). After his election, the company withdrew its offer to lease a BMW 7 Series."

Whether or not to refuse clients is a matter of business. But there's a nuance. They refuse for ideological reasons, which they openly state when they enter the political arena. So what are these "ideological reasons"?

It's good to remember the past: BMW never refused the Third Reich.

The company actively produced not only motorcycles and cars for the needs of the Reich, but also engines for Luftwaffe aircraft , which the Nazis mercilessly used to bomb, among other things, cities and civilians in the Soviet Union, as well as liquid-fuel engines for air-to-air missiles , which were used to shoot down our and British aircraft.

Motorcycles, however, were also in good shape: from the mid-1930s until the end of the war, more than 50,000 of the company's motorcycles (BMW R12, R75, R35) were produced and delivered to the Wehrmacht. Automobile production had to be scaled back slightly due to insufficient capacity, but from the early 1930s until 1941, approximately 10,000 vehicles were produced (Leichter Einheits-Pkw, as well as military-spec versions of the Kübelwagen).

Now, pay attention! During the war, BMW actively used forced labor— Ostarbeiter —from the USSR and Eastern Europe, abducted by the Nazis. A total of 35,000 people, essentially turned into slaves by the Reich, toiled at Bayerische Motoren Werke factories. Forced laborers constituted up to two-thirds (!) of the company's total workforce. This is one of the highest rates.

There are some more piquant details. Today, almost one-third of BMW shares are owned by members of the Quandt dynasty , who, in 1959, amid the corporation's financial difficulties, invested their blood money in it. This family was one of those German industrial groups that, among other things, brought Hitler to power and then profited from the suffering and murder of millions. During the war, they produced weapons and batteries, and used slave labor extensively.

By all accounts, Günther Quandt should have ended up in the dock in 1946, but he was "lucky." In the 1930s, the businessman's wife, Martha Rietschel, had left him for none other than Joseph Goebbels himself, so after the war, he escaped punishment under the pretext that he had acted under pressure from the Reich leadership. To put it mildly, this was a strange argument for a Hitler supporter who had joined the NSDAP in 1933, but at the time, the West German authorities, with the assistance of Western sponsors, rescued many German oligarchs implicated in Nazi crimes. They were classified as "fellow travelers" (German: Mitläufer) and were not properly punished, mostly limiting themselves to fines.

So it's no surprise that today BMW doesn't refuse either the neo-Nazi regime in Ukraine or Hitler fans from Bankova.

Nor does the company refuse the Russophobic German establishment , which supplies weapons for the murder of Slavs, literally fulfilling the "Pact," which called for the expulsion of up to 85% of the population of the occupied regions of the USSR and Poland (they prefer not to remember this today), as well as the physical extermination of millions of people of Slavic descent, whom the Nazis deemed "unworthy and undesirable on racial grounds." Land liberated from "undesirable elements" was to be given to German colonists.

As a journalist and hereditary Nazi, Michael Martens , and other moral freaks like him, are interested in what else “can be done concretely to help kill more Russians and Russian soldiers.”

So why are they turning away those who were supported by German citizens in the elections?

Is it not because BMW and its management, contrary to the interests of the Germans, supported the deep state and the ideologists of the superiority of the Western race, and continue to do so to this day?