🇷🇺📊 Russia’s Budget Becomes Less Dependent on Oil and Gas

Russia’s draft fiscal plans project oil-and-gas revenues falling to 2.7% of GDP by 2029, down from 5.5% in 2024 and an estimated 3.3% in 2026. Alongside that decline, the government expects higher tax receipts outside the oil-and-gas category to carry more of the federal budget.

The Finance Ministry’s published budget, tax and customs policy guidelines for 2027–2029 project a growing role for non-oil-and-gas revenues in financing federal spending. They describe the government’s expected revenue structure over the coming years. The 2026 figure remains an estimate, while the later figures are forecasts rather than money already collected.

The distinction between GDP and budget revenue matters. The 2.7% figure measures federal oil-and-gas receipts against the size of the economy; it does not mean hydrocarbons will supply only 2.7% of the budget. Separate reporting on the draft puts their share of federal revenue at 15.9% in 2029, leaving roughly 84% to other receipts.

The government expects those other revenues to grow through a broader tax base, better collection and changes to tax legislation, both implemented and proposed. That means the budget would draw more heavily on taxable activity across the economy. Some of the increase would also come from tax policy, so higher receipts cannot automatically be read as proof of faster industrial growth.

Several forces explain the declining oil-and-gas ratio. The guidelines cite exchange rates, global energy prices and the composition of production and exports, alongside a projected smaller oil-and-gas sector relative to the economy. A lower ratio alone does not establish that lost energy income has been successfully replaced.

For state finances, the practical test is whether other tax receipts can sustain spending as hydrocarbons contribute less. A broader revenue base could make funding public services, infrastructure and defense less sensitive to swings in energy income. That resilience depends on the wider economy generating enough taxable income to support the plan.

If the forecast holds, pressure on Russian energy exports would have a smaller direct channel into federal finances. Oil and gas would remain important, but the government would fund a larger share of its commitments through other revenues, reducing the extent to which an energy shock dictates its spending choices.

❗