155-240ADπTertullian quoted 1 John 5:7 in 215AD
Latin:"Ita connexus Patris in Filio et Filii in Paracleto, tres efficit coharentes, alterum ex altere, qui tres unum sunt, non unus, quomodo dictum est: ego et pater unum sumus, ad substantiae unitatem, non ad numeri singularitatem."
(Adversus Praxean Chapter 24, Lines 11-13πpage 276)
Link
English:"These three are one thing, not one, as it has been said: I and the Father are one, to the unity of substance, not to the singularity of number."
(Against Praxeas, Chapter 24, Lines 11-13-Page 276)
Tertullian spoke Greek+Latin & knew+quoted 1 John 5:7, or else how did he say "qui tres unum sunt"/"three are one", only found in 1 John 5:7?
This proves 1 John 5:7 existed in 80s-200sAD in order for Tertullian to say "tres unum sunt"(three are one). 1 John 5:7 was translated early from Greek to Old Latin & eventually English. KJB preserves 1 John 5:7, unlike corrupt NIV/NASB/ESV/ASV/LSB/NWT/WEB/NLT/RSV/RV1885/AMP/NRSV/NKJV that doubts 1 John 5:7
Stay with truthful KJB!
Post #881
2.28K

- π 4