Here are the errors of Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, which the modern versions (especially the NIV, NASB, and ESV) claim as their basis and always refer to in the modern versions' footnotes:

John William Burgon, also known as Dean Burgon, lived from 1813 to 1888. He personally examined Vaticanus and Sinaiticus and discovered that they have thousands of word omissions & modification (also known as changes):

"Singular to relate Vaticanus and Aleph [Quick note: Aleph always refers to Sinaiticus, while B refers to Vaticanus] have within the last 20 years established a tyrannical ascendance over the imagination of the critics, which can only be fitly spoken of as a blind superstition. It matters nothing that they are discovered on careful scrutiny to differ essentially, not only from ninety-nine out of a hundred of the whole body of extant mss. besides, but even from one another. In the gospels alone B (Vaticanus) is found to omit at least 2877 words: to add 536, to substitute, 935; to transpose, 2098: to modify 1132 (in all 7578): - the corresponding figures for Aleph being 3455 omitted, 839 added, 1114 substituted, 2299 transposed, 1265 modified (in all 8972). And be it remembered that the omissions, additions, substitutions, transpositions, and modifications, are by no means the same in both. It is, in fact, easier to find two consecutive verses in which these two mss [manuscripts of Sinaiticus & Vaticanus] differ the one from the other, than two consecutive verses in which they entirely agree."

(Page 11, The Revision Revised)


Something else that should be noted is Vaticanus and Sinaiticus' texts, [which modern version falsely claim to be "complete and best bible" (even though they are not complete or best)] do not even completely agree with each other's text readings and words:
"In the Gospels alone Vaticanus has 589 readings quite peculiar to itself, affecting 858 words while Aleph has 1460 such readings, affecting 2640 words."
(Page 319, The Revision Revised).

As for Sinaiticus, it was made in the 1839s, not the 4th century, and therefore is not "the oldest":
For more info exposing Sinaiticus, see:
https://t.me/AntiModernVersions/604
https://t.me/AntiModernVersions/606?single
https://t.me/AntiModernVersions/651
https://t.me/AntiModernVersions/649?single
https://t.me/AntiModernVersions/644

Conclusion: it is best to not trust both Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, along with the modern versions coming from and referring to Vaticanus & Sinaiticus, becauae Sinaiticus & Vaticanus are full of many word omissions, modifications, subtractions, and additions. As a result of Sinaiticus and Vaticanus' vast amount of omissions, modifications, and subtractions, and additions to their texts, the modern versions also do the same things to their texts. Thus, the modern versions, Sinaiticus, and Vaticanus are corrupt texts, and Paul warned of both corrupt texts of God's Word and the people corrupting God's Word.

Paul even warned:
[17] For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.
2 Corinthians 2:17 KJB

Follow Anti Modern Versions