Vaticanus & Sinaiticus' Huge Changes
On Vaticanus (B) [in their "Gospels" section (Matthew, Mark, Luke, & John)]
2,877 omitted words
536 added words
935 substituted words
2,098 transposed words
1,132 modifications
Changes of Vaticanus (B): 7,578
On Sinaiticus [in their "Gospels"] (Matthew, Mark, Luke & John)]
3,455 omitted words
839 added words
1,114 substituted words
2,299 transposed words
1,265 modifications
Changes of Sinaiticus: 8,972
7578+8972=16,550 changes in both Vaticanus & Sinaiticus' in their "Gospels" section (Matthew, Mark, Luke & John) (We checked+verified all the calculations)
(The Revision Revised, Page 12, John William Burgon [Source])
With all this in mind, imagine how many tens of thousands of total changes there are in Vaticanus+Sinaiticus
Conclusion: Vaticanus & Sinaiticus are unreliable+not trustworthy+ are forged documents+an unstable weak foundation of straw that all corrupt modern versions use+rely on. How can you trust any of the corrupt modern versions?
π¬πππ πΈπππππ ππππππππ
Post #2570
986

- π₯ 5
- β€ 2
- π 2
- π± 1