1 John 2:23's Words Defended Go To List, including a defense of the 2nd half of 1 John 2:23 as being inspired Scripture👇 (read whole post so you don'r misunderstand it. 1 John 2:23 is not a mistake but is God's inspired, preserved words. Both 1st half & 2nd half of 1 John 2:23's WORDS are inspired,preserved,geninue Scripture)👇:

👉Overall Evidence for why 1 John 2:23b/2nd half of/last 10 words of 1 John 2:23 is preserved Scripture & should not in be italics but in regular word text format Link
👉Important post showing the King James Bible is 100% complete, supreme, & superior to the inferior Tyndale Bible (decent yet not complete) & inferior Geneva Bible editions: Geneva & Tyndale do not contin 2nd half of 1 John 2:23, while KJB preserves all of 1 John 2:23's words Link
👉In 1 John 2:23, Geneva version removes the words "he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also."Link
👉More evidence for 2nd half [in bold] of 1 John 2:23 being inspired,preserved,genuine Scripture: all 1 John 2:23 is in Codex Alexandrinus(300-400s AD)Link
👉210-256AD:Here's Cyprian's Latin quote of 1 John 2:23 Link
👉 Simon de Colines' 1534 Greek New Testament edition contains 2nd half of 1 John 2:23's words Link

The King James Bible has NO mistakes in its words or doctrines as it is the ONLY perfect English translation from 54 Bible believing, multi-lingustic Christians; therefore, the KJB is the pure, preserved, inspired, translated, trustworthy Word of God. (On the italics word type in the 2nd half of 1 John 2:23, what Anti Modern Versions channel believes is the italics word type in the 1900 KJB/the not-bolded word type in 1611 KJB, is due to the printer not putting the biblical words of the2nd half of 1 John 2:23 AS BOLDED regular type words in 1611 KJB & in regular words format in the 1900 KJB and other KJB editions, not a translation error and not a word error. 54 well skilled, multi-lingustic KJB translators worked on the KJB for 7 years & were demonstrably, provably right h correct with 1 John 2:23 & all the KJB's words. Remember to make a distinction between italized word type from the printer VS the words (in the KJB) themselves [e.g 1 John 2:23's words] which are the words of God. A printer (not the KJB) that misputted God's inspired, preserved+already translated words [2nd half of 1 John 2:23] into italic-word-type format is NOT the same as doctrinal error or word omission. In light of all the above words+Bible doctrine of preservation of God's words, we at Anti Modern Versions support+emphasize+uphold all 1 John 2:23's words, including the 2nd half of 1 John 2:23-we placed 1 John 2:23's words in BOLD, not italics, below

1 John 2:23's words are God's pure, preserved, inspired words & ARE Scripture. The King James Bible's words did not make a mistake in 1 John 2:23. KJB is not corrupt & has no doctrinal errors or word mistakes. 2nd half of 1 John 2:23 is not an improvement, not a mistake, not an unbiblical independent thought that was somehow lost & somehow never existed until 1611, & not an unbiblical, sudden later addition from 1611 or 1881

1611 KJB
Whofoever denieth the Sonne, the fame hath not the Father: but he that acknowledgeth the Sonne, hath the Father alfo.
1900 KJB
Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: [but] he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.

Get+read+believe the words of the King James Bible/KJB only! Also, remember 1 John 2:23 is the PRESERVED words of God! Anti Modern Versions is not ashamed to be KJB Only with its biblical preservationist position [see Psalm 12:6-7], Part 1 (Do you believe that God kept His promise and preserved His inspired Word forever without error?) Link & Part 2 (God preserved His Inspired, Pure, Perfect Word forever: Link)

What Must I Do To Be Saved? The Bible Way To Heaven
📖How to be saved Link
📖The Bible Way To Heaven Link (Text edition is in this Link)
Watch and see the ultimate KJB Documentaries, Videos, and Links Go-To List+Additional Videos and Links
Buy KJBs

Follow 𝕬𝖓𝖙𝖎 𝕸𝖔𝖉𝖊𝖗𝖓 𝐕𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘
@AntiModernVersions
Channel Link: https://t.me/AntiModernVersions