3rd reason older is not necessarily better: they're not even finding complete books of the Bible
Pieces with few letters that you can barely read on it
Fractions and pieces
Specifically when it comes to the Critical Text, there are major portions that are missing
When we look at these, they are even scribbled on & written on, 10 different authors, you can tell they made changes to it
So it's not like they just found a complete Bible from the 1st century and they're not telling us well this is actually the right one
They are finding fragments and using that to really attack the Bible that we had since the Lord Jesus Christ, since the New Testament

You look at these documents they have holes in them, they have scribbles, they're written over, they're missing sections and they don't agree with one another
Yet they have 1.. "they're older" ([a] trick pony)

Older is not always better!

Follow @AntiModernVersions
Anti Modern Versions