The Supreme Court handed down a major free speech ruling that could curb states’ ability to steer children with gender confusion toward social transition.
In an 8–1 decision, the justices sided with Kaley Chiles, a licensed mental health counselor in Colorado.
The implications of the case stretch well beyond one counselor.
Three mothers have joined forces to sue the AAP under the RICO Act.
Enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime, RICO targets organizations that engage in a pattern of illegal activity, including fraud, coercion, and intimidation.
For the first time, a major U.S. medical organization has publicly rejected the medical mutilation of minors, and admitted the evidence simply isn’t there.
The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) broke ranks.
In a new position statement, the organization acknowledged there is “insufficient” evidence to justify gender-related endocrine or surgical interventions for children and adolescents.
In promoting “Enough,” Oprah’s new book on obesity, Dr. Ania Jastreboff argues that advising people to “eat less” or “move more” is “just not possible.”
It’s hard to overstate how damaging and misleading this message is.
Last December, Democrat Governor JB Pritzker signed legislation that allows doctors to prescribe lethal drugs to terminally ill patients with a prognosis of six months or less.
Illinois is now the 12th state to legalize Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID)—or also known as “suicide tourism.”
The U.S. House of Representatives voted to pass the Protect Children’s Innocence Act, marking the first time legislation banning medical mutilation procedures for minors has cleared the chamber.
The bill targets what many doctors describe as the “medical mutilation” of children—procedures referred to by gender activists as “gender-affirming care.”
The CDC has walked back a claim it once treated as untouchable.
Last November, the agency revised its web page on autism and vaccines and added an asterisk to its categorical claim that “vaccines do not cause autism.”
The CDC now admits that statement was never “evidence-based” under federal standards.
An internal FDA memo written by Dr. Vinay Prasad, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, is what Prasad called the first acknowledgment inside the agency that the COVID shots have caused fatal harm in children.
Prasad wrote that the findings force the agency—and the Nation—to confront whether federal COVID-19 “vaccine” campaigns may have harmed more children than they saved, and he criticized the FDA for allegedly failing to thoroughly investigate pediatric deaths earlier.
A newly published study found that women who receive Pfizer’s contraceptive shot, Depo-Provera, face twice the risk of developing a meningioma—a tumor that forms in the membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord.
A class-action lawsuit has been filed against Pfizer, accusing the drugmaker of failing to warn women about the risks.
To understand how public health became so thoroughly corrupted, we have to look upstream—at when and how doctors and scientists first become entangled with pharmaceutical power.
There’s a saying that goes: I tried to follow the science, but it led nowhere. Then I followed the money—and that’s where I found the science.
That line has taken on new meaning in light of a recent report which found that scientific advisers to the British government during the COVID pandemic failed to disclose massive financial ties to pharmaceutical interests.
Every FDA commissioner since the year 2000 has gone on to work in the pharmaceutical industry.
One study found that a third of presidential appointees to the Department of Health and Human Services between 2004 and 2020 later took private-sector pharma jobs that raised conflict-of-interest concerns.